Why is it that people on the left like John Pilger grasp the fact that we live in times in which our civil liberties are being legislated out of existence, yet remain silent about the intensifying attacks on Holocaust revisionists?

Clearly, the war against Holocaust revisionism is a closely-related phenomenon. The same people behind the project for a global slave state are exactly the same people calling everywhere for anti-'hate' (sic) laws and for laws against 'denying' (sic) the so-called Holocaust. Those organs that co-ordinate world government, the EU and the UN, are also the vehicles for the latest pushes to criminalise revisionism, while the same mass media that helps to orchestrate panic over terrorism (and panics over Muslims) is the same mass media that howled like a stuck pig when the Holocaust conference was held in Teheran recently.

It seems to me that the attacks on leading revisionists like German Rudolf constitute a form of intellectual terror whose obvious end result is to generate universal, slavish adherence to the Holocaust myth. The (false) allegations that revisionism fosters antisemitism and racism is the pretext for effectively abrogating the free speech rights that we are all supposed to enjoy under the United Nations charter of Human Rights. We now have in place a vast complex of organisations Jews use to monitor non-Jewish populations for telltale signs of antisemitism and racism. This infrastructure - which actually does a great deal more than simply 'monitor' - amounts to the creation of a permanent (and almost universally tolerated) inquisition within what are supposed to be free and democratic societies.

Since it's obvious that the attacks on Holocaust revisionism only serve to advance the NWO agenda, the question arises as to why the left isn't more worried about it. First of all, I would suggest that it discredits leftist allegations that we are descending into an era of 'fascism.' If the powerful movements of our time were fascists ones, then, given that Holocaust ideology concerns itself only with crimes allegedly committed by fascists, governments everywhere would be promoting Holocaust revisionism, not trying to stamp it out of existence. (Wherever we're headed, it's not towards fascism.) But the left is obviously not in a hurry to confront information that contradicts its leading idea.

Second, it's because the left is terrified of admitting that the Holocaust is not the vehicle for progressive social change we once thought it was. Back in the '70s educators like myself thought Holocaust education would help to reform human beings of their dreadful prejudices and create a peaceful, loving multicultural society. The reality, however, is that belief in the Holocaust is rather the religious-ideological basis of the coming global slave state.

Presumably, the left is under the illusion that, if the Holocaust were to be exposed as a hoax, it would trigger a massive resurgence of antisemitism and racism. One historian I have been in communication with - she works at a Canadian university - told me that she isn't worried about whether the Holocaust happened or not so much as about the effect the resulting exposure would have on society.

I strongly doubt that the laying to rest of Holocaust ideology would provoke pogroms or encourage governments to institute antisemitic legislation, as she seems to fear. Even if there were a revival of popular antisemitism, the fact is it is nobody's business to decide what people may or may not say. We need to stop being control freaks - believing that we can reform people of views we find unacceptable (after all, we all hate it when others try to do that to us). Living in democratic societies means maturing to the point that we accept that many people have views we don't like and we recognise that it's also their human right to articulate their views in whatever manner they choose.

Invitation

Check out my VIDEOS for the first part of the 30-part film 'One Third of the Holocaust.' In an interview with the London Times published on August 29, 2001, Holocaust propagandist Gitta Sereny acknowledged that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp:

'Why on earth have all these people who made Auschwitz into a sacred cow - why didn't they go and look at Treblinka which was an extermination camp? It was possible. There were survivors alive when all this started. Nobody did. It was an almost pathological concentration on this one place. A terrible place – but it was not an extermination camp.'
SOURCE: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/gitta_sereny.htm

The extermination camps, Sereny claims, were places like Treblinka and Sobibor, the so-called Aktion Reinhard camps which, according to Raul Hilberg, were responsible for only about a third of the infamous six million figure. This film systematically destroys the myth that these camps were extermination camps. You can find the entire film here:

http://www.codoh.com/video/onethird.html

Yesterday I came across a weblog entry by a Holocaust freak who declared that there was no disputing the 'historical facts.' The problem is, as this person apparently doesn't realise, is that it is precisely the 'historical facts' which are in dispute. (What the hell does he think people are arguing about, if it's not the facts?) Anyone who attempts to study the Holocaust seriously will soon discover that there are no 'facts,' for Holocaust 'facts' are manufactured at will, when and as the occasion demands.

Every single aspect of the so-called Holocaust turns out, upon close examination, to dissolve into empty allegations. For example, the Germans took over the town of Czestochowa in Poland on the evening of September 3-4, 1939. Many sources claim that a massacre of Jews followed the next day. OK, let's accept for the time being that this massacre really did take place and get down to specifics. How many Jews did the Germans kill?

This website, which cites as its source The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor in Chief, Macmillan Publishing Company: New York, 1990, mentions no massacre at all:
http://www.humboldt.edu/~rescuers/book/damski/dlinks/czest.html

Let's work our way up from zero. The lowest figure I've seen is 60. Please bear in mind that this is the total number of civilians killed, only a part of which would have consisted of Jews:

'On September 4 ... people were hunted down in the town, on the pretext that an attempt had been made to fire at German soldiers from one of the houses. ... About 60 people were seized and shot.'
http://felsztyn.tripod.com/germaninvasion/id4.html

The numbers keep rising from there, although they are usually for both Jews and Poles, not Jews alone:

According to a professional Holocaust scholar who emailed me today, German sources report 96 men and three women killed, thus a total of 99. (This would be both Jews and Poles.) I was told that the source for the information was Commander I/IR42, report "Bericht ueber Tschenstochau", Bundesarchiv-Militaerarchiv RH37/904, p. 35. Whether this report is authentic or not, I have no idea, but if it is authentic, it shows you that many people are deliberately inflating the numbers.

Now we break the 100 barrier:

The Nazis entered 'Czestochowa on Sep. 3, 1939, and the following day they killed over a hundred Jews’:
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/gcpol5.htm

'The Nazis marched into Czestochowa on Sunday, September 3, 1939 ... The next day, which became known as Bloody Monday, approximately 150 people were shot dead in the streets.’ - Wikipedia.
The figure of 150 is also cited here:
http://www.benkazez.com/dan/crarg/town-histories.php

Lord Russell wrote in his book Scourge of the Swastika (1954) that this day ‘180 Jews were shot in the city of Czestochowa for refusing to burn the Torah.’

Die Zeit claims 'over 200' Jewish and Polish men, women and children:
http://www.stsg.de/main/dresden/archiv/presse/bilder/_.pdf

This webpage says exactly 227, although once again this is a figure for BOTH Jews and Poles: 'Soldaten des Infanterieregiments 42 treiben in der Strazacka-Strasse und auf dem Marktplatz jüdische und polnische Einwohner zusammen. Bei Exekutionen kommen 227 Maenner, Frauen und Kinder ums Leben.'
http://www.ghwk.de/2006-neu/raum5.htm

The basis for the 227 figure, I have been informed, was 'an exhumation that had been initiated by the German authorities on the city area' in 1940. Why the Germans would bother conducting an exhumation to determine how many people they had killed when they already had a report giving the precise figure of 99 is beyond me. It's more likely they were exhuming a mass grave to determine how many of their own people (whether soldiers or ethnic Germans) had been killed by someone else.

Anyway, let's keep moving upwards:

This page says several hundred: 'Einige hundert wurden als Vergeltung für eine ungeklaerte Schiesserei ermordet.'
http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/spezial/kritiken/buecher/44607/index.php

Another website says that 'the Nazis killed 300 Jews, in an action known as "Bloody Monday"’:
http://www.deathcamps.org/occupation/czestochowa%20ghetto.html

'More than 300 Jews were killed':
http://yad-vashem.org.il/about_holocaust/month_in_holocaust/june/june_lexicon/czestochowa.html
The figure of 'more than 300' is also cited here:
http://www.holocaust-chronologie.de/chronologie/1939/september/01-07.html

Now, just for fun, let's multiply the highest figure so far by twenty times (who's gonna stop us?):

Leo Scher says that when the Germans arrived in Czestochowa they 'gather[ed] us together, and they told us to lay down on the ground face down. All the men, Jewish and Poles. … Then they killed, in the city of Czestochowa, they killed about six thousand men just for not obeying the order’:
http://www.southerninstitute.info/holocaust_education/leo_scher.html

So how many Jews did the Germans kill in the alleged massacre of September 4, 1939?